Protecting Historic Cemeteries

Abandoned cemetery near Hunt/Delta/Fannin County line. (Photo by author)

Driving down a country road, you see an old cemetery and wonder who those people were and how long ago did they live there. Historic cemeteries, and they are all historic, are some of the most valuable resources in Texas. From the meagre information they provide, we have a directory of the early residents and settlements. They reflect ethnic diversity and the unique populations of an area.

Unfortunately, many of these irreplaceable resources are at risk and have been for years. To counter that, the Texas Historical Commission (THC) has two ways to commemorate these old burial grounds. The first is the Cemetery Preservation Program. Members of the Hunt County Historical Commission, led by John Byrd of Quinlan, have located more than 100 cemeteries in our county. Many are in very good condition while others need a little or a lot more tender, loving care. Those are listed as Designated Historical Cemeteries.

Presently the THC is working to determine the conditions of these cemeteries. Many of the cemeteries have inventories and mark plats of the grounds. That is wonderful. Our clay soil is not favorable to old, or even new, gravesites. To learn more about this project and more about cemetery laws go to http://www.thc.texas.gov/preserve/projects-and-programs/cemetery-preservation. Then if you are interested you can contact me to join the Hunt County Historical Commission.

We have encountered some disturbing news about cemetery preservation here in Hunt County, but overall, we are much luckier than neighboring counties. Before the end of World War II, fortunes were made on Hunt County land in the form of cotton farms. As the economy worsened, more and more lands were obtained to plant more cotton. Cotton growers planted the prized seeds right up to a house. Land owners began to prohibit tenants from raising cows and hogs, or even a small garden patch.

If you walk vacant lands throughout Hunt County, you will locate small cemeteries on the banks of our many creeks. Higher lands were reserved for farming cotton. Every inch of fertile soil was used.

Over the years I have heard some tragic stories about rural cemeteries throughout the State of Texas. Almost every county had at least one Poor Farm where indigent men and women, and occasionally children lived. They worked the county farm to grow food for themselves and prisoners in local jails. Sometimes prisoners who were trusted were sent to the Poor Farm to help with crops, but with a guard closely watching on horseback.
When someone died on the Poor Farm and had no family, they were buried in the small cemetery there. After Poor Farms were sold in the late 1940s, new owners frequently removed all the simple markers, hauled them to a ditch beside the road and continued to farm more land.

We have heard rumors of such events here in Hunt County but have never located one. We recently learned of an abandoned cemetery near the Fannin/Hunt/ Delta County line. In a ditch by the roadside are several pieces of tombstones, store bought, not homemade. We think we have a photograph of the cemetery about 1910 with two obelisks, but was it exactly where the remaining stones are scattered today?

These are known as unknown cemeteries and/or abandoned cemeteries, the second program of THC. We try to identify the real location, to determine if it was a family cemetery. It is a challenge. Come join us.

Posted in Historical tidbits, North Texas History, Texas | Leave a comment

A Century Ago….

Armistice Night, 1918 painting by George Luks (Cover of A Stillness Heard Round the World).

Many of you follow my daily post on Facebook that I branded A Century Ago. For five years I have studied the causes of World War I, how it not only affected lives in both the United States and Europe but throughout the world. Europeans were known for their colonies around the world and brought them in when the going got worse.

I have formed an opinion of the causes of the war. The more I researched, though, the more I wanted to know about the people in Germany. Men, materials, food, medical supplies, and clothing were sent to the Western Front by 1917. What was happening with women, children, and the elderly?

That was not an easy find. My sources are newspaper local to the northeast Texas area. What was the mindset here? There was little sympathy for Germany or her people. It wasn’t the same elsewhere in the United States or even in other parts of Texas. Much like today, public opinion was varied and equally controversial.

My Kindle is full of books about WWI; I have an entire book shelf of WWI books and others stacked in piles. Thanks goodness I can successfully read two books at one time. I have a book upstairs in my office, and one downstairs for when I’m waiting on laundry or dinner to cook. It has almost become an obsession with me.

My paternal grandfather served in the 90th Division, 315th Engineers, Fourth Platoon, Company A where he was a corporal. He often talked about his adventures after the war when he drew maps of the Alsace-Lorraine region in France. I still have some of those maps. But he never mentioned what engineers did during the war, or a role in a combat unit, and other details. I know he was issued a gas mask, and a rifle along with a pistol.

He did talk about the morning of November 11, 1918. Every piece of artillery, every rifle and any other weapon available were busy shooting at the enemy; and that of course depended on which side of the Western Front you were on. My grandfather thought that every man in the entire area wanted to be able to claim he fired the last round of World War I.

Stanley Weintraub interviewed and collected reflections from countless soldiers from all sides of WWI. Some were tragic, others joyous celebrations at the news of the Armistice, and a few regrets from young men just arriving at the front. All appear in A Stillness Heard Round the World that he published in 1985.

The chaos in Berlin is vividly described. By the time German troops from the front made their ways home, the country was filled with Socialists and Communists and very hungry citizens. The Allies did not immediately end the blockade. Food was so scarce starvation was rampant.

From now until November 11, 1918 I plan to focus my post A Century Ago on events, horrors, and chaos for Europeans during that time. German immigrants in the U. S. were tormented, but not starving. What happened to prisoners of war? The numbers captured by Allied troops at the end of the war was amazing. What about the homeless women and children throughout the war zone?

I have one more book to finish, Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. It paints a sad story that the reader realizes leads to more war within a few years. The joy on November 11, 1918 becomes tears, fear and anger in September 1939 when Germany marched into Poland.

Posted in Historical tidbits | Leave a comment

Texas Senate in 1849 Faced Today’s Issues

Tomb stone for Hardin Hart, Texas Senator who represented Hunt County in 1849. He later became Eight District Judge for northeast Texas.

Last weekend I spent several hours reading the Journal of Texas Senate for 1849-1850, online. Boring? A little bit, but it was raining outside, and this needed to be done.

I found some interesting information, but not what I was looking for. The Journal was handwritten each day, approved the next day, and kept in a safe, fireproof location. The Texas Capital burned in 1887 but these documents survived. I suspect that unemployed secretaries during the Depression were hired by the WPA to transcribe and type-set their work. In the last few years they appeared on line. I simply googled the title and there it was. No name recognition index, though.

The United States annexed Texas in late December 1845. Suddenly the Texans had to create laws and statutes for the new state. It was in 1849 that school lands were created; lands set aside for county schools that could be sold with the revenue going into a fund to finance education. We still use those revenues.

The Texas Senate and House approved all marriages, adoptions, name changes, and divorces one by one. That’s why the first 95 marriage records in Hunt County are found in the back of Deed Book A. It was 1851 before counties began keeping those records.

Often the defending attorney asked for a change of venue to a nearby county if he/she believed the client might not receive a fair trial otherwise. In 1849 the party asking for the change had to pay all costs. The proper officer of the receiving county was required to provide security before the suit could be filed.

It was only in 1849 that county residents could vote for District clerks, and then not in all counties. The county court was given the right to appoint jailors. The county courts became regulators of county roads, bridges, ferries, and appointed road overseers.

The Senate spent several days trying to work out usable and economical mail routes. Getting mail once a week was a treat.

Senator Pease introduced a bill to authorize any two county commissioners to perform the duties of Chief Justice (today the County Judge), when the office was vacant or when the Chief Justice was absent from the county. The same conditions existed if the Chief Justice was disqualified to act or deceased.

Senator Van Derlip introduced a bill to prohibit the execution of a mortgage or lien upon a homestead of a family by the husband without the consent of the wife. It passed the Senate, but I do not know if the governor signed the bill into law.

Shortly after Texas entered the Union the Mexican War began. Governor Henderson left his office to lead troops in the war and appointed Albert Clinton Horton acting governor. Horton, in turn, filed a lawsuit against Charles Fenton Mercer and the Mercer Colony. Part of the colony was in Hunt County where 136 families who held Mercer contracts were left with no legal rights to the land they settled. In 1849 Texas Senate passed a bill along with the Texas House for the General Land Office to look into the case. If the contracts were valid, the 136 families were issued clear titles to their land.

One last item I found was a bill for relief of C. C. Taylor. That’s my name but I haven’t seen any funds from the Texas Senate of 1849-1850.

Posted in Historical tidbits, Texas | Leave a comment

Horses, Mules or Automobiles

Buggies, wagons, and street cars in downtown Greenville, Texas, ca. 1912.

The ad in the Cooper Review in September 1918 read, “Wanted: good young buggy horse for use this season. Must be free goer and safe to hitch any place.”

The year 1918 was one of confusion, war in Europe, limited flour, sugar, and other baking goods, and the type of transportation best for the muddy black clay soil of northeast Texas. For the average citizens in north Texas, the first two were way out of her reach, but not the last. Automobiles were sold and driven throughout the United States. But not everyone was convinced of their worth.

Every so often that summer some young man would offer his spiffy new car for sale since he was about to sail to war in France. Others put theirs on blocks in the barns.
More prosperous town dwellers purchased larger cars for the family. Sunday afternoon drives were extremely popular. But was everyone in northeast Texas smitten with the automobile?

Evidently the newspaper reporter looking for a good, reliable buggy horse felt an equine suited his needs quite well. After all, he would be traveling through the county and to county seats as far away as Sulphur Springs, Clarksville and Greenville. As soon as the rains set in, those black dirt roads would not be navigable in an automobile.

A free-goer indicates the new owner would often let the horse follow the road while he worked on an article he was writing. A horse that could be hitched at any place would not try to nick another horse on the rail or at a tree. It would be a gentle animal. After reading this I wondered if the owner would rather have a ground tied horse that didn’t need a place to tie the reins.

Ground tied horses were trained very early when a cowboy was taming the horse. It learned to stand still when the rider dropped the reins straight down on the ground and walked away. No need to tie the reins to something else. Ground tied horses were used primarily in ranching counties, where if the rider was thrown off or there was no place to tie up the horse, the rider would not be left afoot for several miles when the horse decided to go back to the barn. (Could any self-respected cowboy walk several miles?)

The issue of automobiles versus equines was not resolved until the early years of World War II, some twenty plus years later. I have heard old-timers talk about buggies and wagons around courthouses up until 1940.

John W. (Dub) Duncan of Wolfe City told me when he was young the family went to town in a wagon. There were places to tie horses and mules in the alley or even to the wagon. His dad always took a bale of hay for the kids to sit on and for the horses to eat during the day. There was a water vat in the alley where horses or mules could drink during the day.

Dale Gaskill remembered lots of old home places had big circular driveways for wagons and buggies. My great-grandparents had a big open area at the end of the road leading up to their house. That was where wagons turned around; but I doubt that very many buggies travelled that path. I asked my father one time if he was embarrassed when his grandparents came to town in their wagon. He said no, because that was the norm.

Horses and mules were familiar, less expensive, and perfectly suited to those whose travels were not far away. That’s just one more way World War II changed our lives. I certainly would hate to ride fifteen or twenty miles, sitting on a bale of hay, with the temperature in the 90s or above.

Posted in Historical tidbits, North Texas History | Leave a comment

The Bicycle Bloc

Young female cyclist clad in the latest bloomers for a ride through the countryside.

Greenville successfully enjoyed the 22nd Annual Cotton Patch Challenge Bicycle Rally in downtown this weekend.  But can you imagine such an event becoming a moral controversy?  Bicycling became a favorite sport throughout the midwestern United States in the 1890s.  Young men formed clubs, some daring young ladies joined in as the trend became something of a political and religious controversy.

The League of American Wheelmen (LAW) founded by cyclists in 1887 spread rapidly across the country, especially in the north.  Their influence sparked the movement of better roads, but we’ve already seen that project reach fruition.  1896 was an election year; William Jennings Bryant, the perennial Democratic candidate, again ran for president.  The Republican candidate William McKinley was not a strong campaigner.  He was a home body who disliked the thought of crossing the nation in a railway car.

To counter this disparity, the Republican Party introduced a political faction known as the Bicycle Bloc to campaign for McKinley.  More than 70,000 young men were swing voters who agreed to hand out buttons and give speeches as they rode through the countryside.  They were particularly successful in Michigan and Ohio.  Few made their ways south, maybe the summer heat or the stuffier environment had something to do with that.

Seeing how much fun their male friends were having intrigued many young women.  It was a means of freedom in a way.  Soon young women and girls were riding this new kind of mobility.  They relished unchaperoned dates; even elopements on bicycles.   In Boston, after the closure of brothels, prostitutes rode bicycles to reach clients.  But most upsetting to the older generation was the fact that these young women wore bloomers!  It was disgraceful!

Bloomers were cut like men’s pants but much fuller.  They allowed females to ride astride a bicycle or horse.  Yet, the very idea of such clothing for the fairer sex was terribly indecent.  Many a mother bemoaned the style and fretted over what the world was coming to.

The 1890s identified the Gilded Age, with thousands of laborers crowded into industrial cities and towns.  Sunday was the only work-free day for the vast majority of people.  Youngsters and young adults much preferred to spend their free time cycling over the country side and through towns than attending church.  The number of men attending church services was on a decline, threatening to leave preachers with congregations of only sick and elderly souls.

Opponents of bicycles claimed the sport was unhealthy and vicious.  Yet, supporters rebutted, cycling built courage, determination, and strength.  An added plus was that cycling was a definite alternative to saloons and gaming houses.

In 1903 Henry Ford introduced the assembly line to automobile manufacturers, including himself.  And BOOM!  Cars became the In-Thing, what everybody had to have.  Abruptly bicycles became the mode of transportation for the working class.  Automobiles were King of the Road.

Did Greenville youth take to bicycling?  It’s unclear but the odds are pretty strong that the sport was popular at Mayo’s College in Commerce.  His wife Etta was always up for new ideas, especially for women.

Posted in Historical tidbits | Leave a comment

Fleeing to Texas

Undated photograph of Theodore Higgins Sampley after he moved to Bryson, Texas. (Ancestry.com)

When the Civil War was over, veterans of both the Union Army and the Confederate Army found total chaos as they returned home. Yes, there were men in the South who joined the Union Army. They and their families suffered much more. Most of the Union supporters lived in the northeast corner of Alabama, northwest Georgia, eastern Tennessee, and the western mountains in North and South Carolina.

Within two years after Lee’s surrender, southern farmers thought seriously about migrating west to Texas, where land was plentiful, fertile, and cheap. 1872 was the peak year for migration.

Theodore Higgins (T.H.) Sampley was one of nine children born to Jesse Sampley and his wife Debra Browder Sampley. Since there were numerous men named Jesse Sampley living in Jackson and Dekalb Counties of northeastern Alabama, T. H.’s father was known as “the cabinet maker.” Both Browder and Sampley families migrated to north Alabama in the 1840s from East Tennessee and retained their loyalty to the Union.

When the war began, T. H.’s oldest brother Oliver Miller Sampley joined the Confederate Army and died at Murfreesboro in 1862. Jesse the cabinet maker packed up his wife, five daughters and two sons, and moved back to east Tennessee where they stayed until Jesse died in 1864.

The family moved back to Fort Payne, Alabama and began to resurrect their old life. T. H. volunteered as a teamster for the Union Army from January 1864 until July 1865. Older brother served as a sergeant in the Alabama/Tennessee Independent Vidette Cavalry (USA).

The first sibling and family to leave Fort Payne was sister Rutha who married James M. McCloud, a Confederate veteran. They first settled in Titus County and were there when T. H., his wife, and three children arrived in 1878 on their way farther west. T. H. and family settled near the new community of Bryson in Jack County. There he became a prosperous farmer. Within 18 months Rutha and James McCloud arrived and organized a Methodist Church. T. H. and his family were charter members. In fact, T. H. was the only one of his four brothers who did not become a Methodist preacher.

Over the years, at least two sisters, two brothers, numerous nieces and nephews moved to Bryson. They survived a drought in 1886/1887 and the recession and another drought in 1896. Brother E. B. Sampley and his wife Mary Jane didn’t particularly like the dry, arid place during a stay in 1899-1900. Mary Jane did find the prairie dogs “darling.” E. B. and younger brother Jasper J. with their families moved back to the Fort Payne area. However, one of their daughters moved to Bryson a few years later.

Each morning after T. H. finished his farm chores, he rode his horse around Bryson, checking to see that all of his relatives were fine, visited with them, and talked politics or weather before moving on to the next family. It was at that time T. H. became known, in the family at least, as Daily. It wasn’t that he was particularly nosy, he simply cared about his extended family.

His first wife died in 1901. On July 7, 1918 the Fort Worth Star-Telegram ran an item about Daily. He and Miss Mary Grantham of Grays, Arkansas had corresponded for some time. They decided to meet in Fort Worth and marry. When they arrived, Daily met Rev. Mr. Vaughan, a mutual friend. After quickly obtaining a marriage license, the couple were married in the large main lobby in full view of the throngs of travelers passing through the station.

Mr. and Mrs. Sampley left that afternoon on the return train to Bryson.

Posted in Historical tidbits, North Texas History, Texas | 1 Comment

Serving the Republic of Texas

Memucan Hunt (1807-1856) left a prosperous business to come to Texas with hopes of seeing action in the Texas Revolution. Instead, his statesmanship helped Texas to gain U. S. recognition, and later he served as the Secretary of the Texas Navy. Hunt County was named in his honor. (Wikipedia)

The first session of the Texas State Legislature handled more decisions with less arguing than most sessions since then. Those men, yes there were no women elected to any office in 1846, not only set up the legal systems in the new state, created state laws, but they were charged with laying out thirty-one brand new counties.

Smaller counties meant more settlers could register new land acquisitions, pay taxes, and have access to law enforcement closer to home. The Republic of Texas had a limited number of counties, thanks to the wording of its Constitution. By 1845 there were only thirty-six county governments in the whole nation.

For most of March and April 1846, the House of Representatives carved out new counties from existing ones. Once the new legislation was read three times and passed, it was sent to the Senate for approval. When the legislative process was finished the bill was sent to the governor, James Pickney Henderson, for his signature.

Most names for the first thirty-one new counties were in honor of three rivers, the current governor, two vice-presidents of the Republic and numerous other men involved either with the Republic or the Annexation of Texas to the United States. Memucan Hunt was such a person.

Hunt was born in 1807 in North Carolina where he made a name for himself and a large fortune as a planter and a businessman. In 1834 he moved to Mississippi where he briefly resided before learning about the Texas Revolution. Intent on volunteering he arrived at San Jacinto after the battle was over.

He was a clever, articulate man with many friends. Texas leaders found a job for him quickly. He went to Washington as an appointed agent to the United States to work with William H. Wharton in securing recognition for Texas. The two men accomplished their goal in March 1837. Instead of returning to Texas, he proposed annexation in 1837, only to have it rejected by Congress and President Martin Van Buren. The following year he negotiated a boundary convention with the United States.

During President Lamar’s term Hunt continued his work on the boundary commission. In 1841 he returned to Texas where he ran unsuccessfully for Vice-President of Texas. He continued to work to arbitrate Texas and U. S. boundaries. For compensation he was rewarded with a large area of land in McCulloch, Runnels, Concho, San Saba, and Mason counties. Hunt died in 1856 while visiting his brother in Tennessee. At the time he was pushing for a railroad to connect Galveston Bay and the Red River.

Recently a lady from Virginia was looking through files in the National Archives and the U. S. Navy Memorial Heritage Center in Washington, D. C. when she found records pertaining to Memucan Hunt’s stay at the Texas Legation. At that time, Washington was a rather primitive town where visitors, government officials, and others resided in a boarding houses. Hunt stayed at Mrs. Page’s, a boarding house across Pennsylvania Avenue from Centre Market, now the site of the National Archives. Of course, all the old boarding houses are gone, much too disrespectful for the United States capital today.

Posted in Greenville, Historical tidbits, North Texas History, Texas | Leave a comment

Really, Labor Unions in North Texas?

Few, if any, women picketed on strikes in Greenville. But scenes like these two garment workers were the norm other parts of Texas. We’ve come a long way in the last century. (Lumen Learning)

Two days ago, September 3, was Labor Day. So what did you do? I happened to need to finish writing the five papers I was in final stages of completing. Therefore, I worked. I suspect many went to the lake, to the mall to go shopping, to the theater to watch a movie, or something else equally enjoyable.

Dr. Jean Stuntz, a noted history professor at West Texas A&M University, posted on Facebook that many would be surprised to learn the origin of the day off. Perhaps you know that is was first known as Labor’s Holiday in 1894 when Congress made it a legal public holiday. Today it is simply Labor Day, a day to celebrate the efforts of all those who came before us to give manual laborers such things as eight-hour work days, 40-hour work weeks, paid vacations, employee health benefits, worker safety laws, compensation for on-the-job injuries and other benefits. Driving these issues were Socialists such as Eugene V. Debs.

I scanned through city directories for 1913 and 1922. Then I googled “labor unions in Greenville, Texas.” Today we have one United Auto Workers (UAW) group in town with 918 members. All seem to be employed by the defense plant that has been here since the 1950s. Because of its secrecy, the average citizen has only a vague idea of what goes on in the big complex at the edge of town. However, we know many people who work there. Strikes are not common today.

What about labor unions in 1913 and 1922? I have no numbers for membership but I do know that in both years railroad employees were leaders in the labor movement in Greenville, Texas. In both years there were four railway lines in and out of Greenville, a hub for the thriving cotton industry. So it was not surprise that Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Brotherhood of Railway Carmen, and Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen were active throughout the nine year time period.

Not only were railroad employees involved in labor unions but also so were Greenville Typographers and unions for movie theater projectionists. A survey of local newspapers shows all of these unions went on strike at least once. None lasted for any length of time.

The Ancient Order of United Workmen (AOUW) was listed only in 1913. This group was open to any laborers and provided mutual social and financial support for members. Similar to Woodmen of the World for farmers, it offered insurance for sickness, accidents, death, and burial policies. No interaction between employers and employees on safety, hourly wages, etc. was a part of this organization.

The more drastic measures in unions stand to big business seemed to have centered on large cities or company towns. Greenville was a mixture of tenant farmers, small industry, railroads, bankers, and cotton buyers. The problems were there but leadership was not.

Posted in Greenville, Historical tidbits, North Texas History, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Where’s the Army Motor Company?

Map of the Bankhead Highway route through northeast Texas. From Texas Highway No. 1, The Bankhead Highway in Texas: A Highway History and Guide to the Earliest Texas Route. An excellent work by Dan L. Smith (2013).

In 1903 Henry Ford began mass production of automobiles, an event that drastically

altered life around the world. But not surprisingly, the automobile had few, if any, good roads to travel. Travel and transportation of goods were still challenges. Over the next fifteen years, counties and states began to upgrade their roads. In some cities, roads were paved, but costly roadwork was not the norm in rural areas where roads were usually dirt and gravel. That meant problems galore in rainy weather.

With the availability of more motor vehicles, numerous Good Road Associations sprang up almost overnight. Each promoted good roads in their regions, pointing out that improved roads would reduce travel costs, bring greater reliability and lower freight rates. Since this was barely fifty years after the Civil War, many of this proposed roads carried the names of Civil War heroes, much like those Confederate monuments erected at the same time.

The associations were public relation groups, not road builders. The major roadblock (no pun intended) was lack of funds. Only the federal government had that kind of money; but many citizens questioned the Constitutional right to build roads. Finally, the Supreme Court approved and Congress passed the Federal Aid Road Act of 1916. Sometimes called the Bankhead Bill in honor of Senator John H. Bankhead of Alabama who pushed the bill through, it was signed into law soon after by President Woodrow Wilson, an automobile devotee. Federal funds were available and roads needed building. But each state must have an established highway department, of which Texas and South Carolina had none. That little minor detail was soon rectified in both states.

The route of the roads needed to be laid out. A group of men known as “pathfinders” scouted existing roads that met the following criteria: 1) shortest distance; 2) condition of current roads; and 3) the amount of local support to aid with cost and future maintenance.

This marker recognizing the route of the Bankhead Highway through Greenville is located on the building now housing the Corner Street Pub on Lee Street.

Bankhead Highway entered Texas at Texarkana and exited in El Paso, being the longest portion of the highway that began at the White House in Washington, D. C., and ended in San Diego, California. Here in Texas it was also known as Texas Highway 1. It came south through Greenville on Stonewall Street, turned west on Lee Street, south on Wellington to O’Neal where it connected with what is now Texas Highway 66.

Within weeks of President Wilson signing the Bankhead Bill, the United States was in World War I. The horrible road conditions that slowed armies to a crawl awoke the military of the need for military highways in the U. S.

The Bankhead Highway would be chosen; after all it was an all season transcontinental highway.

On May 7, 1920 the U. S. Army’s Second Transcontinental Motor Company left the White House on its way to San Diego. Estimated time was 84 days. In the processional were 30 trucks, 10 Dodge automobiles, and 160 men with 32 officers. It was to be a National Road for National Defense; an opportunity for field training, to test equipment, and to recruit men for the Army motor corps.

That summer happened to be the rainiest on record. Travel through Mississippi and Arkansas was a disaster. When they arrived in Texarkana, the commander decided to not take the official route through Mt. Pleasant, Sulphur Springs, Greenville and Rockwall to Dallas as the route was in low lying areas part of the way. Instead, the route went through Clarksville, Paris, Honey Grove, and Bonham before reaching Dallas. That route is on a high ridge but the poor towns, including Greenville, were left out after long hours of preparations to welcome the procession.

Yet, the route through Greenville became part of the official Bankhead Highway or Texas Highway 1 during the heydays of the 1920s. In 1926, the Texas Highway Commission decided there were too many names to remember; numbers were easier to use on highways. The arrival of Interstate 30 after World War II cut traffic on the Bankhead. But it served its place in the early years of the Automobile Age.

Posted in Greenville, Historical tidbits, North Texas History | Leave a comment

Red Roof Barn

Aerial view of the farm owned by the Greens. The Red Roof Barn is the largest building. The inset to the roof was where Green broadcast his radio show. This was something in the late 1920s. (Complement of John W. Dub Duncan.)

Sometime in the 1880s a farmer from Illinois came to Hunt County to visit his daughter and her family, also farmers. Riding in a wagon to the couple’s farmhouse, the Illinois farmer observed different methods of farming between the two states. Yes, Illinois does not have the same climate Texas does, but the differences he noticed were relevant to technology in either state.

First he noticed how muddy the streams were. Then he looked at the fields of cotton, all plowed and planted in rows. That was where the soil came from that muddied the water. For miles and miles all that was visible were fields of cotton. His daughter’s family had a milk cow, a garden spot thriving with vegetables and a few hogs. No orchard was in sight only cotton.

During his visit the Illinois farmer talked to several old-timers. He learned that when the county was young, streams were so clear the bottom could be seen filled with fish. Most of the farms raised their own food plus wheat and oats for sale. Cattle roamed on the open, virgin prairies. However, the arrival of the railroads in 1880 changed the agricultural scene.

Cotton was a cash crop, buyers in Greenville and other surrounding towns paid “good money” for the farmers’ crops. Buyers and landowners pushed for larger fields and less livestock. The more cotton produced the lower the prices were. But no one wanted to quit such a profitable business.

The Illinois farmer probably talked with his son-in-law about rotating crops and plowing in large circles to prevent runoff from rain. He was not the only one in the area trying to introduce new farm methods.

Last week I wrote about J. Riley Green of Wolfe City and the introduction of better roads. Green (1869-1927) was also an advocate of better farming techniques, diversification of crops and raising livestock as well as cotton. He served as public weigher for the north part of Hunt County and saw the amounts of cotton produced.

Around the time of World War I J. Riley Green began a successful career as an auctioneer of livestock and agricultural real estate. At one point in 1918 he sold a herd of cattle, mules, and horses in Celeste and netted $6,000. Today that equates to $99,551.52 according to Inflation Calculator at westegg.com.

Green was a great after dinner speaker at many banquets held by farmers groups. He talked about growing wheat one year, corn the next and cotton the third year. He talked about leaving a field fallow or planting peanuts to increase nutrients lost when growing cotton. He encouraged raising hogs or poultry in place of beef cattle. Every family should have a milk cow, he preached.

In 1921 J. Riley Green and his wife were instrumental in forming the Hunt County Stockmen Association where he held an office. At that time Mr. and Mrs. Green built an enormous red barn on their farm south of Wolfe City. He was so successful as an agricultural speaker he started the Red Roof Barn radio program.

At the same time the Greens started a herd of Jersey cattle. These small dairy cattle were first raised on the Island of Jersey in the English Channel. They are known for high butterfat content, lower maintenance costs, and a genial disposition.

At the time of his death, J. Riley Green was a member of the Board of Directors of the National Jersey Cattle Raisers Association of American. His wife continued to be active in the association and in raising Jersey cattle. And the red barn? It remained a landmark in Wolfe City until a few years ago when it was razed to make way for the new Wolfe City High School. I suspect it is missed.

Posted in Historical tidbits, North Texas History | Leave a comment